[Ichneumon]

What catches my eye is Rissing and his compadres issuing statements regarding the content of Leonards work without ever having read it.

So... Have you actually read Rissing et al's statements before posting your own declaration concerning them?

Smacks of bitchiness and agendas, no?

What does your own "commenting without reading their statement" smack of, then?

[jwalsh07]

You're fos. I read the story in the Columbus Dispatch where three of your brethern in academia trashed the students work while admitting they had never read it. They did so by using the media and their fellow travelers on the internet. They know they have reliable sheep like you to carry their water and lo and behold they were right.

You don't have an ounce of intellectual honesty in your body. And btw, I read all the crap you posted before you posted it in an effort to get the facts straight. Your posts and the zillions you can find from Neo Darwinist extremists on this topic is sophist bs sprinkled with a touch of ad hominem and guilt by association.

You can post 50 more ND diatribes and it won't change the fact that three so called scientists accused a student of unethical and illicit behavior based on a dissertation they hadn't read and you and your pals defend it by claiming that hearsay is now part of the scientific method.

Typical of leftists in academia, I expect better from "conservatives".