Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are big footprints bigfoot prints? (Alberta)
Lakeside Leader ^ | 7/7/05 | James Boston

Posted on 07/08/2005 9:12:59 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana

Are big footprints bigfoot prints?

James Boston Lakeside Leader

Nobody wants to talk openly about the footprints found in the bush near the Blue Sky Road, 60 kilometres north of town. There’s a certain reluctance to having one’s name attached to a story about one of North America’s most enduring mysteries, the existence of Bigfoot. A man who wished to remain anonymous delivered photographs of the footprints to the The Lakeside Leader last week. The creature that made them leaves an impression 15 inches long and several inches deep with grooves that would indicate short, claw-like toenails. They are unlike any bear print. The man who took the pictures believes the creature must have been enormously heavy, because the feet of a human barely leave an impression in the soil. He says that rumours of the Bigfoot have been circulating for years among those who leave in the wilds north of Lesser Slave Lake. He was prompted to go in search of evidence of Bigfoot’s existence when stories began to circulate that someone had recently come face to face with the creature. A source at Fish and Wildlife confirms that a man did report a sighting about a month ago. Fish and Wildlife officers took a plaster cast of a footprint, but it is said to be of poor quality because the sighting wasn’t immediately reported. Also, during the delay heavy rain had eroded the impressions. The man who reported the sighting wasn’t interviewed for this article. Family members who spoke to The Leader say they don’t want the publicity. The man who photographed the footprints, however, claims to have heard the tale of the sighting. Allegedly, the creature is seven or eight feet tall. Tufts of white hair cover his eyebrows and the knuckles of his toes. The hair across his abdomen and forearms is a yellow or blonde colour. Bigfoot sightings in Canada, or at least those reported in the media, go back nearly one hundred years. One of the earliest stories to appear about the Bigfoot was a 1929 article in McLean’s magazine written by J. W. Burns, a schoolteacher in British Columbia. Burns was the first to use the name Sasquatch for the Bigfoot, a word he created by mixing two words from aboriginal languages describing the creature, sokqueatl and soss-q’tal. As of yet, no conclusive evidence of Bigfoot’s existence has ever been found.


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bigfoot; cryptozoology
The man who took the pictures believes the creature must have been enormously heavy,~snip~

Allegedly, the creature is seven or eight feet tall. Tufts of white hair cover his eyebrows and the knuckles of his toes. The hair across his abdomen and forearms is a yellow or blonde colour. ~snip~


1 posted on 07/08/2005 9:13:01 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana

Oooh, the newspaper 'silly season' is traditionally August, but it appears to have arrived early in Alberta! ;-)


2 posted on 07/08/2005 9:15:11 PM PDT by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happygal

Well, maybe it's hot up there.


3 posted on 07/08/2005 9:19:08 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana (I was Lucy Ramirez when being Lucy Ramirez wasn't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana

It's NEVER hot up there. Tepid, maybe.


4 posted on 07/08/2005 9:20:27 PM PDT by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Happygal

Well, it just needs to be warm enough to have an excuse to drink a 6-pack, and you end up with either a UFO or Bigfoot photo.


5 posted on 07/08/2005 9:21:22 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana (I was Lucy Ramirez when being Lucy Ramirez wasn't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
close but no cigar


6 posted on 07/08/2005 9:24:47 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana

Isn't ALWAYS warm enough to drink a 6-pack!

Hey, I'm Irish...and I've been to Alberta in late November, and still managed to crack open a tinny or two! (Not to mention taste some of the dodgy home-distilled wines those people make!)


7 posted on 07/08/2005 9:26:05 PM PDT by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana

A story about photos, that doesn't publish the said photos is a non-story.

Even the WWN ("The world's most reliable newspaper") does better than that...even if they have to create the "photos" themselves.


8 posted on 07/09/2005 12:12:22 AM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The world needs more work horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agitator

Patterson swore on his deathbed that film was true. And the people who were consulted about re-producing it said if you had a few million you MIGHT be able to come close, but probably never that good.

I once saw a computer enhanced copy. It plainly is not a man or a woman or Janet Reno in a suit.


9 posted on 07/09/2005 12:19:31 AM PDT by djf (Government wants the same things I do - MY guns, MY property, MY freedoms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson