That post made me wonder? Where is their hearts??? Here we are talking about it rationally, insulting the very people that caused it, and here they are, bashing a person who has helped America out and now shares our pain. Also, it makes me wonder if they know proper English or even correct knowledge itself.
Here would be the correct way to say what the person should have said, in correct English with correct knowledge.
"Yes, Blair, 'barbaric', just like the daisy-cutters President Bush and yourself dropped on the Iraqis. As Richard Clark predicted, your pre-emptive war on Iraq, as well as your friend's, President Bush, has brought more terrorist attacks upon the world. Wake up, you brought this on all of us."
As far as I know, I don't believe the English had Daisy-Cutters. But I could be mistaken. I'm not that knowledgeable. Although I'm more knowledgeable than any demorat. And most of the stuff I learned about politics and the constitution was here.
Another thing that's bothering me is they seem to be saying that Iraq wasn't in any way affiliated with Al Qaida, so how come England would be targetted by Al Qaida?
I don't disagree with you; however, you might as well ask the sun to stop shining.
The only problem with Clarke's analysis is that the War in Iraq didn't cause the 9-11 attack so he has something half a** backwards. The question is: Why didn't Clarke insist on Clinton upping security in the US after 1993? Why didn't Clarke insist on Clinton taking out Usama?