Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TASMANIANRED
LOL! Nope.
4 posted on 07/05/2005 8:47:26 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: smoothsailing

I was going to compliment you on a pretty good rant.

My own infinitely expandable work:

Taz's Rules, How to recognize a liberal.

1) Liberals always argue from a false premise.

Global Warming=False premise

Woman's right to choose=false premise

Gun control means less crime=False premise

Right to die=false premise

2)Liberals will muddy the water with every irrelevant pile they can find.

3 When liberals can't win and you are making them look like an idiot they will confirm it by name calling.

4) Discussing facts with a liberal is like teaching a pig to sing..

They argue from an emotional position and facts are totally irrelevant to them.

5) Liberals pretend to care more than anybody else about individuals they don't .

They think in terms of classes (Marxists) and don't give a flying fig about individuals.

6)Liberals will turn language on it's ear.

Singer is an ethicist but he argues for infanticide and bestiality.

Huh, that sounds like the antithesis of ethics to me.

7)Liberal research=fakery,forgery,falsification

thanks to socialismisinsidious for editorial support

8)History for liberals begins each morning.

Pointing out previous contradictions is called attack speech.

Pointing out the results of a policy is called racism,homophobia,or attacking the victim.


I accept all suggestions and footnote for credit where it is due see #7.


5 posted on 07/05/2005 8:58:13 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Democrats haven't had a new idea since Karl Marx.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson