Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC Analyst Says Cooper Documents Reveal Karl Rove as Source in Plame Case
Editori and Publisher ^ | July 1, 2005 | E&P Staff

Posted on 07/02/2005 7:59:14 AM PDT by summer

NEW YORK -- Now that Time Inc. has turned over documents to federal court, presumably revealing who its reporter, Matt Cooper, identified as his source in the Valerie Plame/CIA case, speculation runs rampant on the name of that source, and what might happen to him or her. Tonight, on the syndicated McLaughlin Group political talk show, Lawrence O'Donnell, senior MSNBC political analyst, claimed to know that name--and it is, according to him, top White House mastermind Karl Rove.

Here is the transcript of O'Donnell's remarks:

"What we're going to go to now in the next stage, when Matt Cooper's e-mails, within Time Magazine, are handed over to the grand jury, the ultimate revelation, probably within the week of who his source is.

"And I know I'm going to get pulled into the grand jury for saying this but the source of...for Matt Cooper was Karl Rove, and that will be revealed in this document dump that Time magazine's going to do with the grand jury."

Other panelists then joined in discussing whether, if true, this would suggest a perjury rap for Rove, if he told the grand jury he did not leak to Cooper. ...

(Excerpt) Read more at editorandpublisher.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: cialeak; plamecase
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-208 next last
To: BigSkyFreeper
Editor and Publisher

Plame Grand Jury Wants Records for Air Force One Phone Calls

By E&P Staff

Published: July 02, 2005 2:35 PM ET

NEW YORK Adding to the growing intrigue in the Plame case, the grand jury investigating the leak of the covert CIA operative's name subpoenaed has a wide range of White House documents, including records of telephone calls from Air Force One and information relating to an internal working group dealing with Iraq, government sources confirmed to CNN on Friday.

"We are complying fully with the request from the Department of Justice," White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters Friday.

Government sources told CNN the federal grand jury was seeking any information about contacts between White House officials and more than two dozen reporters. The grand jury also asked for a transcript of a briefing by former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer.

The subpoenaed information regarding telephone calls to and from Air Force One, sources said, covered July 7-12, while the president was on a trip to Africa. The requested transcript was from a briefing during that trip as well.

Newsday reported that two of the subpoenas dealt mostly with requests for information before and after the publication of Robert Novak's fateful July 14 column, which outed Plame.

Many of the documents subpoenaed Friday relate to the White House Iraq Group, a little-known task force. Newsweek reported that the group was created in August 2002.
The Newsweek report cites an earlier Washington Post article that lists senior political adviser Karl Rove, Bush advisers Karen Hughes and Mary Matalin, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice and Vice President Dick Cheney among the group's members.

The grand jury, which met again Friday, has heard from at least four current or former White House officials. Much of its work recently has also reportedly been to pore over many documents relating to the case.

141 posted on 07/02/2005 12:57:12 PM PDT by Woliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: summer

Lawrence O'Donnell--CREEPY LIAR!


142 posted on 07/02/2005 1:03:26 PM PDT by Dr.Hilarious (If Al Qaeda took over the judiciary and mainstream media, would we know the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Re post #136 - LOL...OK, I will get my act together here! (And fix this keyboard.) :)


143 posted on 07/02/2005 1:04:55 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Woliff

Re your post #141 - Thanks for posting that new E&P article, but it just all goes back to my initial and on-going confusion. This investigation sounds like it's really looking for something, in earnest, but I don't know what, and I don't know why. Everyime I think I understand it, all the facts seem to change in some new important way. So, I'm just going to wait and see.


144 posted on 07/02/2005 1:07:04 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Woliff

telephone records/calls....geeeeez!....what's up with that?


145 posted on 07/02/2005 1:08:32 PM PDT by mystery-ak (The real Supreme Court meets up here...God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Woliff
One thing is for sure -- this is certainly the hot blog topic today. Here's how it's playing out on a Dem site, on its homepage's headline:

"Second Source Confirms that Karl Rove Exposed a CIA Operative Who Specialized in Tracking the Illicit Trade of WMD AT THE SAME TIME Rove Was Masterminding a Propaganda Campaign Claiming We Went to War With Iraq Because of Illicit WMDs. If True, The Man Betrayed the National Security Interests of the USA."

And, it links to this new E&P article:

MSNBC Analyst Says 2nd Source Confirms Karl Rove as Plame Leaker-- July 2, 2005, 1PM:

Excerpt:

...Lawrence O'Donnell, senior MSNBC political analyst, now claims that at least two sources have confirmed that the name is--top White House mastermind Karl Rove.

O'Donnell first offered this report Friday night on the syndicated McLaughlin Group political talk show. Today, he went beyond that, writing a brief entry at the Huffington Post blog....

146 posted on 07/02/2005 1:13:16 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: summer

I thought all this stuff had gone away and the investigation was about to wrap up.

I suppose it was the Supreme Court´s decision that resurrected it all again.


147 posted on 07/02/2005 1:14:43 PM PDT by Woliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Woliff; All

See post #126 for the Huffington blog post mentioned above.


148 posted on 07/02/2005 1:14:57 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Woliff

Your guess is as good as mine!


149 posted on 07/02/2005 1:15:22 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
telephone records/calls....geeeeez!....what's up with that?

Who knows, perhaps perjury is being investigated.

150 posted on 07/02/2005 1:19:46 PM PDT by Woliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas

The leaks did not originate at the WH.

Period.

They didn't lie about it, either. The timeline simply does not support the scenario you describe.

I can well imagine that the anti-Bush rogues who trumped up this whole yellowcake caper mislead investigators, though.


151 posted on 07/02/2005 1:24:32 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I still don't understand what is happening or what this means, but it seems to be improving the sex lives of some Dem posters, ie:

AUYellowDog (139 posts)
Sat Jul-02-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message

5. I almost had an orgasm when I read that n/t

152 posted on 07/02/2005 1:28:14 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Tiger Smack
but if it is true

It's not, however you may wish it were.

153 posted on 07/02/2005 1:28:31 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Woliff

Somebody lied to an investigator. They don't like that very much.


154 posted on 07/02/2005 1:30:14 PM PDT by notigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Woliff

Those documents were turned over long ago.


155 posted on 07/02/2005 1:32:41 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: notigar

When they come up empty that is always a fall back option.


156 posted on 07/02/2005 1:34:36 PM PDT by Woliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: notigar; MinuteGal
The NEWSWEEK story is out now - The Rove Factor? This text below is posted on a Dem site, apparently as an excerpt from the article:

Now the story may be about to take another turn. The e-mails surrendered by Time Inc., which are largely between Cooper and his editors, show that one of Cooper's sources was White House deputy chief of staff Karl Rove, according to two lawyers who asked not to be identified because they are representing witnesses sympathetic to the White House. Cooper and a Time spokeswoman declined to comment. But in an interview with NEWSWEEK, Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin, confirmed that Rove had been interviewed by Cooper for the article. It is unclear, however, what passed between Cooper and Rove.
157 posted on 07/02/2005 1:34:53 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Before you know it, O'Donnell will be out there saying Rove stuffed top secret docs down Bergers pants.


158 posted on 07/02/2005 1:36:34 PM PDT by Cougar66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Those documents were turned over long ago.

"We are complying fully with the request from the Department of Justice," White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters Friday"

Seems that it is ongoing not past tense.

159 posted on 07/02/2005 1:39:21 PM PDT by Woliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: summer

I see in thanking people for their contributions to the thread, you ignored common sense explanations that provide context to the saga as well.

I have pointed out that Rove spoke with reporters after Novak's column and was not the source for the column so his name will indeed appear in Cooper's notes.

The article you link here seems to confirm that despite the lefty twist the players then give that information.

I have to question why you are pushing the O'Donnell/Wilson version. It has been pointed out repeatedly that Wilson originally claimed Rove was out to get him and that was debunked long ago. It is not confusing, as you claim. It is wrong to take demonstrable falsehoods and continue to ponder them as if they are valid puzzle pieces.


160 posted on 07/02/2005 1:40:20 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson