Replies

I see in thanking people for their contributions to the thread, you ignored common sense explanations that provide context to the saga as well.

I have pointed out that Rove spoke with reporters after Novak's column and was not the source for the column so his name will indeed appear in Cooper's notes.

The article you link here seems to confirm that despite the lefty twist the players then give that information.

I have to question why you are pushing the O'Donnell/Wilson version. It has been pointed out repeatedly that Wilson originally claimed Rove was out to get him and that was debunked long ago. It is not confusing, as you claim. It is wrong to take demonstrable falsehoods and continue to ponder them as if they are valid puzzle pieces.

you ignored common sense explanations that provide context to the saga as well.

Not at all. I just think we have to wait and see, and as I pointed out, you can't always believe a tv pundit or MSM.

I have to question why you are pushing the O'Donnell/Wilson version.

ROTFLMAO...I don't know which "version" that is -- but I have been hopping around the web, and this story is all over the place. That may mean it is something, or that it is nothing, or that everyone else out there is reading FR! Save your suspicions for someone more deserving of them than me! :)