Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush: "Nominate Janice Brown today" Nominate Janice Rogers Brown Today
rushlimbaugh ^ | July 1 05 | rushlimbaugh

Posted on 07/01/2005 4:47:59 PM PDT by churchillbuff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2005 4:48:00 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Word up!


2 posted on 07/01/2005 4:48:40 PM PDT by Drango (tag line under repair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Rush: "I think he ought to nominate Janice Rogers Brown this afternoon."

So do I

3 posted on 07/01/2005 4:51:18 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

I disagree. Nominate somewith with a proven federal appeallate record. Brown has been a state court judge dealing with state court issues, which are very different than the constitutional ones which come before the US Supreme Court. Plus, some judges start acting differently once they get a lifetime federal appointment- Brown has been an elected judge til now.

She's probably be fine, but there's no need to chance it when there's a rock-solid bet like Luttig on deck.


4 posted on 07/01/2005 4:52:08 PM PDT by Altair333 (Stop illegal immigration: George Allen in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altair333
I disagree. Nominate somewith with a proven federal appeallate record. Brown has been a state court judge dealing with state court issues, which are very different than the constitutional ones which come before the US Supreme Court."""

That's not true. State supreme courts deal with federal constitutional issues every day. O'Connor came out of a state court of appeal (Arizona); she wasn't even on that state's top court.

5 posted on 07/01/2005 4:55:58 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
It makes sense to me. If the RATs complain she hasn't had enough time on the 1st DCA the response is "whose fault is that? She was nominated 3 years ago." The RATs would be hard pressed to suddenly declare her extreme and her opposition to government taking will resonate with us all. Let the RATs try to paint that an extreme position! Oh, if only they confirmed her when she was first nominated they could oppose her now. Sweeeeeeet.
6 posted on 07/01/2005 4:57:00 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Same stuff, different democRAT [this tagline rated PG-13])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

The more Ted (the Swimmer) Kennedy whines like a stuck pig the better. Janice Brown for SPJ !


7 posted on 07/01/2005 4:59:59 PM PDT by John Lenin (Liberalism: Where defeat is victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
I want a true blue conservative who will not get weak in the knees over time. I do not care what color, religion or ethnic group they come from. Janice Rogers Brown seems great to me, but if not her, someone like her.

Happy Birthday US of AAAAAAAAAA...

8 posted on 07/01/2005 5:01:27 PM PDT by Pharmboy (There is no positive correlation between the ability to write, act, sing or dance and being right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

"That's not true. State supreme courts deal with federal constitutional issues every day. O'Connor came out of a state court of appeal (Arizona); she wasn't even on that state's top court."

From a strategic standpoint, nominating Janice Rogers Brown would be a good move. Let the Dems try to shoot her down, in what will likely be a highly public display of hypocrisy. And, I've read enough of her opinions to think that this lady is constructionist to the core. This is not exactly the politically popular view for being elected in her state, so there's no motive for her to misstate her position that I can see.


9 posted on 07/01/2005 5:01:34 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry (Esse Quam Videre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
What about Priscilla Owens....she a true conservative and a women.

My personal pick is Judge Brown...first and foremost, a women and she's black...now that's another first kinda like Condi Rice.

10 posted on 07/01/2005 5:08:55 PM PDT by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: shield

Yep...no namby pambies. Real conservatives. How 'bout Mark Levin?


11 posted on 07/01/2005 5:11:30 PM PDT by Pharmboy (There is no positive correlation between the ability to write, act, sing or dance and being right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

"That's not true. State supreme courts deal with federal constitutional issues every day"

No they don't- I used to work for one. We very rarely dealt with a federal constitutional issue. Tort cases, criminal cases, that kind of thing was our bread and butter.

"O'Connor came out of a state court of appeal (Arizona)"

So did David Souter.


12 posted on 07/01/2005 5:11:53 PM PDT by Altair333 (Stop illegal immigration: George Allen in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Altair333

One caveat- we did deal with constitutional issues in the criminal context- 4th amendment issues, that kind of thing.

But there's a wide range of federal constitutional issues which have nothing to do with criminal law. And we very, very rarely dealt with those.


13 posted on 07/01/2005 5:14:48 PM PDT by Altair333 (Stop illegal immigration: George Allen in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Altair333
[...]Plus, some judges start acting differently once they get a lifetime federal appointment- Brown has been an elected judge til now.

Not like she was pandering to conservatives out in California. :) Anyway, if you read her writing, there is very little doubt about the sincerity of her opinions.

14 posted on 07/01/2005 5:18:43 PM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

I'd suggest Ann Coulter, Olsen or Bork, in that order.


15 posted on 07/01/2005 5:22:03 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Don't Tread on Me; Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: shield

"now that's another first kinda like Condi Rice."

... and the opposition already has egg on their collective (collectivist?) faces, due to some notable missteps and crudity in their attempts to undermine Condi. Nominate Janice Rogers Brown, and when the brouhaha starts to heat up, haunt them with every racist or perceived racist comment and political cartoon that was ever directed at Conoleeza Rice. Field day.


16 posted on 07/01/2005 5:22:49 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry (Esse Quam Videre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

No argument there, friend...


17 posted on 07/01/2005 5:22:59 PM PDT by Pharmboy (There is no positive correlation between the ability to write, act, sing or dance and being right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Janice Rogers Brown was the first person I thought of when I heard the news.

Then I thought of how the left-wing organizations have geared up for her...too much lead time.

And being black won't get them to cut her any slack. Look at the Hell they put Justice Thomas through - making up lies and bringing in a former associate to try to nail him.
I cannot believe anyone would subject themselves to the feeding frenzy that will accompany the nomination.

Frankly, I wish there was a movie type ending to this - such as an unknown who has been under the radar, but is a true Conservative, and who would confuse all the sharks circling, waiting for blood in the water.


18 posted on 07/01/2005 5:32:52 PM PDT by Rhetorical pi2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Janice Rogers Brown would be an excellent choice. I'd love to see the DemocRATS fighting against her getting that job. We are exposing 'RAT racism more and more everyday.


19 posted on 07/01/2005 5:37:40 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Rhetorical pi2

"Then I thought of how the left-wing organizations have geared up for her...too much lead time."

Any "dirt" has already been exposed, and I know of very little ammo other than her obvious distaste for certain socialist pet programs that have a highly emotional appeal. That would be true of any conservative, though.


20 posted on 07/01/2005 5:38:01 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry (Esse Quam Videre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson