[Cboldt]

Her retirement village should be condemned, and siezed.

I don't like O'Connor as a jurist, but mostly because of her opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, and similarly weak "logic."

But in the recent [New London] takings case, she wrote the dissent that noted the risks inherent in a broad interpretation of the phrase "public use."

[AmishDude]

O'Connor's dissent was often described as "scathing".