[nuffsenuff]

Turning this into a "pro-life" vs. "pro-choice" debate will play right into the libs hands.

This needs to be about interpreting the Constitution.

We win this battle every time.

Don't cloud the issue.

[Spiff]

Turning this into a "pro-life" vs. "pro-choice" debate will play right into the libs hands. This needs to be about interpreting the Constitution. We win this battle every time. Don't cloud the issue.

Whether the "interpreted" Constitution protects the rights of a mother to pay a butcher to dismember her baby in her womb (a heinous act that is carried out 1.3 MILLION times per year in the U.S.) IS THE ISSUE!!! Stop trying to cloud it by putting any other priority ahead of it.

[DManA]

You are exactly right. In fact you don't have to be Pro-Life to understand that Row was a flawed decision, for many reasons.

[Raquel]

"Turning this into a "pro-life" vs. "pro-choice" debate will play right into the libs hands."

It is precisely the pro-life judges that the liberals are objecting to with the most fury. We want our voices to be heard, not held back quietly. This is an opportunity to finally end the crime of abortion, that not just kills the most innocent of victims, but attacks the heart of the family.

Support pro-life -- it's contagious.

White House comment line: 202-456-1111

President's e-mail: president@whitehouse.gov