[Spiff]

Turning this into a "pro-life" vs. "pro-choice" debate will play right into the libs hands. This needs to be about interpreting the Constitution. We win this battle every time. Don't cloud the issue.

Whether the "interpreted" Constitution protects the rights of a mother to pay a butcher to dismember her baby in her womb (a heinous act that is carried out 1.3 MILLION times per year in the U.S.) IS THE ISSUE!!! Stop trying to cloud it by putting any other priority ahead of it.

[nuffsenuff]

I understand. I agree.

But I'm talking about how best to accomplish the goal.

Making it an abortion battle is not going to work.

It needs to be about the Constitution.

[mzbzybee]

That is true. But this is not the time. Constructionism is the issue. Abortion is a fight for another day. The abortion issue must kept off the table for now. Even if Roe v. Wade is reversed, it will not change anything. California will still permit it. We must wait.