To: Gipper08
I want someone that rules on the law not makes it up as they go along. After seeing comments on here in recent weeks by conservatives that don't like a ruling and want an activist court, I want a constructionist nominated -- one who construes a legal document (as the U.S. Constitution) in a specific way
(from Webster's)
350 posted on
07/01/2005 7:55:26 AM PDT by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
To: PhiKapMom
I'd take a justice who is a bit more conservative than OConner. That all. I admit I don't know enough about Gonzales, is he more conservative than Sandy? Other than his pro-Roe sentiments, which don't bother me as much as it does some here, I dont know much about him. Perhaps we need a thread on Potential Candidates, where we post info about them, and some opinion..
380 posted on
07/01/2005 7:58:27 AM PDT by
Paradox
(Sometimes, a beer or two makes my writing more lucid. Sometimes, it takes 3 or 4.)
To: PhiKapMom
Do you believe in numerated rights? If you do then you are a conservative.Then there is no need to"make it up as we go along" The Liberal judges are not killing us,it is the moderates and GWB has nominated many of those.(moderates = Liberal BTW)
396 posted on
07/01/2005 8:00:05 AM PDT by
Gipper08
(Mike Pence in 2008)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson