Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhiKapMom
Some of you folks are the most negative people I know -- the President could nominate the most strict Constitutionalist and some of you are going to be wringing your hands.

You just got through posting to someone who said he DOESN'T EXPECT BUSH TO DISAPPOINT HIM. Hence, he was not being negative. What is it with the paranoia that you and a few others have been showing on this thread?

342 posted on 07/01/2005 7:54:53 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]


To: inquest

Did you see what he put up before saying what he did -- that's what I am talking about. You obviously haven't been reading threads on here lately with the sky is falling approach. Instead of facts, we get feelings about what might happen. I thought his post was inappropriate because there are no facts to back up that supposition but he covered himself with saying he didn't believe it -- then why post it?


440 posted on 07/01/2005 8:05:12 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson