Complete nonsense that deserve no serious rebuttal.
If Bush picks a good one, then I'd expect those seven to get allergic. I hope he's more concerned about public pressure than that idiot senate.
I personally think NOW is the time for them to start itching. As to the latter, I am not interested in him being concerned about public pressure. As I stated, until and IF he violates his solid judicial record I give the President the benefit of the doubt that his position on the court is my own. Were this about spending, illegal immigration etc...his record would determine he not be granted the benfit of the doubt until action determined otherwise.
Impeachment? I look to the long record held by rehnquist and he's proven to be solidly in the Thomas/Scalia camp in rulings. That is my primary concern. I fault Congress for the impeachment proceedings. They did as they willed, rhenquist or no.
"Elton John, or Elton John's boyfriend. Complete nonsense that deserve no serious rebuttal."
Ok, his good friend, Bill Clinton then.
"Were this about spending, illegal immigration etc...his record would determine he not be granted the benfit of the doubt until action determined otherwise."
Judgement overlaps. I don't think it's a given that Bush will make the right choice without pressure.
"Impeachment? I look to the long record held by rehnquist and he's proven to be solidly in the Thomas/Scalia camp in rulings. That is my primary concern. I fault Congress for the impeachment proceedings. They did as they willed, rhenquist or no."
You don't care about the Constitution and the Justice's role in impeachment? HE PRESIDES. People are just hoping for table scraps of conscience, here-- some illusion of conservatism, which is better than flat-out liberalism, I agree. But it's still the wrong path.