Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Physicist
It is possible that the particles we see are all actually massless, their apparent masses corresponding to extra-dimensional momentum components we can't as yet detect.

Interesting, but I don't get it. (Not an uncommon event when I read about this stuff). So you have a bunch of massless particles in a 3d space, presumably moving in straight lines except when they collide. If you project them onto a 2d space, aren't they still going to appear to move in straight lines? Or is the projection somehow a nonlinear function that can map straight lines to orbits and other curved paths? Even if so, if the particles in the 3d space move independently of each other, how would any projection create the appearance of dependency?

I don't know if that made any sense; I find this stuff fascinating but am missing a lot of the theoretical background. Trying to get through Penrose's Road to Reality, but I start spacing out on calculus on manifolds...

41 posted on 06/30/2005 11:09:46 AM PDT by ThinkDifferent (These pretzels are making me thirsty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: ThinkDifferent
If you project them onto a 2d space, aren't they still going to appear to move in straight lines? Or is the projection somehow a nonlinear function that can map straight lines to orbits and other curved paths?

I'm not talking about gravity, here, I'm talking about straight Newtonian mechanics. Billiard balls. F=ma.

45 posted on 06/30/2005 11:55:58 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson