Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This land was your land [It's time for a new tea party]
World Net Daily ^ | June 24, 2005 | Josepph Farah

Posted on 06/24/2005 5:59:15 AM PDT by conservativecorner

I wrote a book a few years ago about property rights.

It was called, "This Land Is Our Land."

I didn't think of it as an optimistic book at the time.

But after yesterday's chilling U.S. Supreme Court ruling that government can seize our property against our will for no other reason than it capriciously chooses to do so, the title is certainly no longer accurate.

We do not own our property any more in America.

Imagine the home you own – the one you scrimped and saved your entire life to purchase, the one you planned on living in for the rest of your life, the one you planned to pass on to your heirs – was taken from you, capriciously by a small group of local officials in conspiracy with wealthy developers who want to level it and build office buildings.

You may not have to imagine it. It could happen to you any time. It has already happened to a group of Connecticut homeowners – salt-of-the-earth, working Americans whose modest homes represent their life savings, their estates, their life's work.

That was the finding of the U.S. Supreme Court yesterday. Your property is not your property.

That home you invested so much of your life in – it belongs to the government. It is only on loan to you until the day the government chooses to loan it to someone else. That is the message of the black-robed tyrants. Listen to it well.

This is the most basic freedom – upon which all the other liberties we hold dear are built.

That's what the founding fathers explained. Freedom of speech? It descends, they said, from the right to property. Your thoughts, your beliefs, your opinions were equated with your personal property and possessions. That's why you had the right to express them according to your conscience.

Notice I said "had."

Five fascists on the U.S. Supreme Court undercut every freedom we know in America.

I do not exaggerate when I say they have done more damage to the Constitution than any five people in history.

Stop worrying about Osama bin Laden and nuclear-armed terrorists. All they can do is kill you. Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, John Paul Stephens and Stephen G. Breyer have done something worse. They would have you live in servitude to the state. They would reduce all free Americans to serfs. They would make government your master.

The Congress better stop worrying about trivial issues like flag desecration. The Constitution has just been trampled, spit upon and torched. In doing so, these judicial terrorists have done more harm to the American way of life than weapons of mass destruction ever could.

If this ruling is permitted to stand by the U.S. Congress, it's simply time to start shopping for a new country or start planning the revolution. I don't know what else to say about it.

President Bush needs to speak out against this travesty of justice. The Congress needs to be heard from. Yes, the Congress has the power, should it ever have the courage to use it, to set aside a ruling like this and permanently enjoin the court from ever ruling in the future against the well-enshrined, inalienable, well-documented, constitutionally protected right to own and enjoy property.

This country was birthed in a war of independence fought against an unaccountable empire that failed to acknowledge and respect the rights of colonists in America. But the grievances of those heroic patriots that created the greatest experiment in freedom the world has ever known were trivial compared to the grievances 21st-century Americans have against the empire in Washington.

The only question is whether or not we have the courage of our forefathers. Are we willing to sacrifice our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to reclaim our American birthright of freedom?

It's time for a new tea party. It's time for a new Lexington and Concord. It's time for a new Declaration of Independence. It's time for civil disobedience and throwing off the shackles of rule by men. It's time to begin plotting how to re-establish the rule of law under a sovereign God.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: eminentdomain; farah; kelo; privateproperty; supremecourt; tyranny; tyrrany
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

1 posted on 06/24/2005 5:59:15 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

This ruling is much worse than you think. It has the of cascaded effect. In other words:

A widow has an undeveloped property as an investment from her late husband. A judge rules that a developer can develop houses on it to increase property taxes to support the local schools. The widow is given the minimum amount for the land and the developer puts a house on the land.

A year later, the city fathers decide that they want a huge mall to get revenue for their local sales tax. The Widows home and all the other homes in that area are given to the Project Managers of the Mall. The homeowners are given the minimum values of their homes.

A year later, the State decides that the mall is environmentally unsafe and writes a bill to have it turned into a environmentally wetland. The mall is razed and the roads around it. The businesses in the mall are given the minimum value for their property and the employees are fired.

Brave new world huh?


2 posted on 06/24/2005 6:00:36 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

I think it is time. We do need to make our 'elected leaders' know who the BOSS is, and it is not them.

They are out of control. Answering to everyone but the very people who elect them into office. The question, Do we have the backbone today to do this?


3 posted on 06/24/2005 6:02:45 AM PDT by television is just wrong (http://hehttp://print.google.com/print/doc?articleidisblogs.blogspot.com/ (visit blogs, visit ads).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
President Bush needs to speak out against this travesty of justice. The Congress needs to be heard from.

Yup, I'm waiting for the "ownership society" and the "people vs the powerful" speeches. So far the closest thing I've seen is this: Statement of Ralph Nader on Supreme Court Eminent Domain.

Pathetic..

4 posted on 06/24/2005 6:03:36 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

I still just cannot believe this ruling. Are the 5 justices totally senile now? I am so mad about this. Has Bush said anything yet? Has anyone in Congress?


5 posted on 06/24/2005 6:03:57 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

bump


6 posted on 06/24/2005 6:08:01 AM PDT by Centurion2000 ("THE REDNECK PROBLEM" ..... we prefer the term, "Agro-Americans")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

The right against unreasonable search and seizure is gone too. Think of it, a state agency will be able to come onto their (no longer your) property to make assessments on the disposition of the state's property. Anything illegal they see will be fair game.


7 posted on 06/24/2005 6:11:56 AM PDT by samm1148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

I have got to tell ya folks, this SCOTUS ruling is buzzing all over the Internet. Liberal web sites are decrying it, (One Quote: "I never thought I'd see the day I agree with Thomas and Scalia"), my local news website can talk of nothing else, and even non political sites like a woodworking site my husband visits are raving about this. If George wants to get nominees to the Supreme Court voted in, all he has to do is ask their opinion on eminent domain. Heck, make it clear any court nominee now held up is against indiscriminate taking and they are a shoe in.


8 posted on 06/24/2005 6:14:56 AM PDT by sportutegrl (People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

America's robed mullahs have spoken.


9 posted on 06/24/2005 6:15:01 AM PDT by PGalt (Great article. Thanks for posting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl

Sorry, I meant, "shoo in".


10 posted on 06/24/2005 6:16:43 AM PDT by sportutegrl (People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

New "local Government" Happy Dance Song

This land was your land
But now it's my land!
From California
To the New York islands
From the redwood forests
To the gulf stream waters...
Your land may now be seized by me!


11 posted on 06/24/2005 6:16:50 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Woody Guthrie's song was actually about communism principles.. the land belongs to all of us.. not one person... In fact a verse exists, though it is rarely sung where he bashes private property rights completely...

A copy recorded with the anti-private property rights, sung by the man himself is believed to be one of the most priceless items in the national archives.

I know it comes as a shock, but that song was a protest song against capitalism, written during the depression era.


12 posted on 06/24/2005 6:19:39 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Great song. Can somebody put together a video?


13 posted on 06/24/2005 6:21:04 AM PDT by sportutegrl (People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

How about a "Don't Touch My Property!" march on the Supreme Court when it reconvenes in Oct. (Notice these gutless, chinless wonders waited till the end of this session to release this stink-bomb of a ruling.) A million people brandishing pitchforks would make a great picture on TV and perhaps impress upon these tyrants that the people are not asleep....or are they?


14 posted on 06/24/2005 6:25:38 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Paging Claire Wolfe, I think it is time.

Will we as sovereign citizens, with GOD GIVEN rights, allow our liberty to be usurped by the oligarchy? I am willing to bet we will. Those that try and defend the constitution against this abomination, one of many by the way, will be picked off one by one, and portrayed as right wing kooks.

Where is the leader of the country, the Republican party and the defender of the constitution? Paging wimp boy George Bush, the country needs a leader. If you are unwilling to step forward, resign and lets try a President Cheney for a while.

15 posted on 06/24/2005 6:26:02 AM PDT by jeremiah (Patrick Henry said it best, give me liberty or give me death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Without the right to own property, the rest of it will go away very quickly.
I have read that in Jefferson's first draft of the Declaration of Independence the line, "Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" read "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of PROPERTY." IMHO there are five justices on the Supreme Court that should be impeached.
16 posted on 06/24/2005 6:26:06 AM PDT by Bar-Face
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl
Stop property right violations Kelo v. New London
17 posted on 06/24/2005 6:26:29 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl
SIGN PETITION Stop property right violations Kelo v. New London
18 posted on 06/24/2005 6:26:51 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: television is just wrong
...anyone wanna bet that future Congress's and Senates will be fill by developers and megabucks mall investors.


Doogle
20 posted on 06/24/2005 6:30:39 AM PDT by Doogle (8th AF...4077thTFW....408MMS....Ubon Thailand "69"..Night Line Delivery ..AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson