Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FightThePower!

Coal is cheaper, and also plentiful in the US.


102 posted on 06/22/2005 7:26:51 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Diddle E. Squat
Coal is cheaper, and also plentiful in the US.

It's also very dirty, both to mine and to burn. It even releases more radioactive waste than nuclear does, and unlike in nuclear plants this stuff is not concentrated and collected - it just wafts away into the air, into your lungs.

120 posted on 06/22/2005 9:30:46 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat

Coal plants are cheaper to build but power from nuclear plants is produced at far lower costs than coal. Look at the run up in coal prices and you'll see that it isn't as cheap as it used to be.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/page/coalnews/coalmar.html


145 posted on 06/23/2005 6:59:25 AM PDT by FightThePower!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Coal is cheaper, and also plentiful in the US.

No free lunch on these, either:

Only Two Things Wrong With Coal, You Can’t Mine It, And You Can’t Burn It

So say the wackos, anyway. Time to go back to the caves and bearskins.

146 posted on 06/23/2005 7:33:42 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson