You do this all the time. Point after point that you assert gets proven wrong and you simply shrug and say it's not important and you move on to the next faulty supposition.
It is important if he claimed something that was not so. It undermines his credibility and casts doubt (to say the least) on his pronouncements, especially this latest analysis of the autopsy.
I spoke the exact truth. I am interested in Terri's case. I don't give a bleep whether Dr. Hammesfahr was or was not nominated for a Nobel. It has nothing to do with Terri. That what ad hominem means -- the point is irrelevant. It is of no interest. It is not germane. It is not useful. It is a waste of time. It is a waste of bandwidth. It is not worth discussing.
Lay off the personal remarks, please.