Posted on 06/15/2005 9:51:07 PM PDT by FairOpinion
Is there any point at which is it okay to cease care?
Actually one of the doctors the parent brought in was the only one who made the point, that she is blind in one eye, and can only see things very near her with the other.
"Or it proves you need to do a bit more research. "
Look in the mirror and say that to yourself, then DO it.
You made so many incorrect statements -- some of which we corrected -- that demonstrates you just regurgitate the MSM statements and haven't bother to read anything for yourself.
I concur with every word you write here.
An excellent point. A study done in England found that many so-called PVS patients were misdiagnosed because of limitations such as blindness.
And it is truly amusing that it wasn't until the autopsy that they were able to pronounce this.
Generally, after Karen Quinlan, the idea that the cerebral cortex is the center of awareness has been rejected. Instead it is now thought that the hypothalamus serves this function.
We Death trolls won, you lost, get over it.
It's all been a conspirancy to destroy humanity.
You are a freaking nut case.
"Terri Schiavo is a trial run for the future imploding of Social Security and Medicare. The coming rationing of services was the reason I went to court in 1992 against the prohibition of the private contract. Though it is difficult financially for many to bow out of the system, it may be necessary to do so in the near future to maintain our honor and our values. The shades of the Hegelian Rational Utility are upon us, just as I predicted in my speeches years ago. The rush to judgment despite so many ambiguities was fueled by euthanasia advocates' thirst for a precedent."
the new face of medicaid
"Seniors and the disabled are pushing the program to the breaking point"
"The authors of the article describing Karen Quinlan's pathological findings draw attention to the limitations of our understanding of the neuroanatomical basis for human consciousness. At one time consciousness was though to reside in the cortex, then came our understanding of the limbic system and the role of the brain stem reticular formation in cerebral arousal. The findings in Karen Quinlan's brain suggested that the thalamus played a more crucial role in consciousness and awareness than was previously thought."
So the weight of her brain doesn't mean much.
How lovely. And revealing.
and spreading unsubstantiated rumors is not.
"We Death trolls won, you lost, get over it. It's all been a conspirancy to destroy humanity. You are a freaking nut case."
Yeah, I'm downright crazy to not believe that a Blind judge can read the body languages of witnesses he decided not to allow in the court. I'm a nutcase to hear a human voice on a tape, told by multiple people it was her voice, and then actually believe my lying ears. I'm a nutcase to not believe Judge Greer and ignore all the nurses he so wisely estimated as being 'uncreditable' when he couldn't even see their faces, their stance, their eyes, or the set of their shoulders. I'm a nutcase when Michael's claim of her will is under question, not only based on a deposition, but also based on the long time delay of his claim.
"It's all been a conspirancy to destroy humanity." Yeah, throw it on more thick, why don't you? I didn't mention the slaughter of 6 billion, just 40 million. I realise that 40 million isn't much when you are thinking globally, but that's a pretty big number to me.
I guess I was lied to when I was told that 40 million unborn being slaughtered. I call that a Holocaust. I cannot respect or trust a court system that permitted such a Holocaust. HOW CAN YOU TRUST SUCH A COURT SYSTEM?
They need to be impeached. All those judges who supported that disgraceful mock trial are not fit to hold a gavel. I will not give up on that call. And YOU might as well get over THAT!
Isn't that what you believe?
That process doesn't sound like it would be pain free either. Torture would be more apt. No morphine in her system according to M.E.
"brain cell shrinkage causes the brain to pull away from the calvarium => tearing of bridging subdural vessels => intracranial hemorrhage"
I'm just a layman on the human body, I readilly admit. But if you love someone, and you are told by that loved one's family memebers that she talked, and they play the tape, and they show you videos of her appearing to respond, what would you expect the judge to do? Would you honestly expect the judge to ignore all that?
Frankly, I don't even need to prove that she could have recovered. The burden of proof lies on the executioner.
You saw or heard a tape of her talking? Is that the same one Tom DeLay saw?
Man you are warped, you are encompassing everything from 40 million abortions to Terry.
You have a lot of anger. Maybe you need a vacation or something
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.