Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A NEW EXODUS? AMERICANS ARE EXITING LIBERAL CHRUCHES:
Christianpost.com ^ | Christianpost.com

Posted on 06/15/2005 9:06:08 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2

"We have figured out your problem. You're the only one here who believes in God." That statement, addressed to a young seminarian, introduces Dave Shiflett's new book, Exodus: Why Americans are Fleeing Liberal Churches for Conservative Christianity. The book is an important contribution, and Shiflett offers compelling evidence that liberal Christianity is fast imploding upon itself.

"Americans are vacating progressive pews and flocking to churches that offer more traditional versions of Christianity," Shiflett asserts. This author is not subtle, and he gets right to the point: "Most people go to church to get something they cannot get elsewhere. This consuming public--people who already believe, or who are attempting to believe, who want their children to believe--go to church to learn about the mysterious Truth on which the Christian religion is built. They want the Good News, not the minister's political views or intellectual coaching. The latter creates sprawling vacancies in the pews. Indeed, those empty pews can be considered the earthly reward for abandoning heaven, traditionally understood."

Taken alone, the statistics tell much of the story. Shiflett takes his reader through some of the most salient statistical trends and wonders aloud why liberal churches and denominations seem steadfastly determined to follow a path that will lead to their own destruction. Shiflett also has a unique eye for comparative statistics, indicating, for example, that "there may now be twice as many lesbians in the United States as Episcopalians."

Citing a study published in 2000 by the Glenmary Research Center, Shiflett reports that the Presbyterian Church USA declined by 11.6 percent over the previous decade, while the United Methodist Church lost "only" 6.7 percent and the Episcopal Church lost 5.3 percent. The United Church of Christ was abandoned by 14.8 percent of its members, while the American Baptist Churches USA were reduced by 5.7 percent.

On the other side of the theological divide, most conservative denominations are growing. The conservative Presbyterian Church in America [PCA] grew 42.4 percent in the same decade that the more liberal Presbyterian denomination lost 11.6 percent of its members. Other conservative denominations experiencing significant growth included the Christian Missionary Alliance (21.8 percent), the Evangelical Free Church (57.2 percent), the Assemblies of God (18.5 percent), and the Southern Baptist Convention (five percent).

As quoted in Exodus, Glenmary director Ken Sanchagrin told the New York Times that he was "astounded to see that by and large the growing churches are those that we ordinarily call conservative. And when I looked at those that were declining, most were moderate or liberal churches. And the more liberal the denomination, by most people's definition, the more they were losing."

Any informed observer of American religious life would know that these trends are not new--not by a long shot. The more liberal Protestant denominations have been losing members by the thousands since the 1960s, with the Episcopal Church USA having lost fully one half of its members over the period.

In a sense, the travail of the Episcopal Church USA is the leading focus of Shiflett's book. Indeed, Shiflett states his intention to begin "with the train wreck known as the Episcopal Church USA." As he tells it, "One Tuesday in latter-day Christendom, the sun rose in the east, the sky became a pleasant blue, and the Episcopal Church USA elected a gay man as bishop for a small New Hampshire diocese." How could this happen? The ordination of a non-celibate homosexual man as a bishop of the Episcopal Church flew directly in the face of the clear teachings of Scripture and the official doctrinal positions of the church. No matter--the Episcopal Church USA was determined to normalize homosexuality, even as they have normalized divorce and remarriage. As Shiflett explains, "It is commonly understood that the election of the Reverend Gene Robinson, an openly gay priest, to be bishop of the diocese of New Hampshire was undertaken in clear opposition to traditional church teaching and Scripture. What is often left unsaid is that this is hardly the first time tradition has been trounced. The Reverend Gene Robinson's sexual life was an issue and was accommodated, just as the Episcopal Church earlier found a way to embrace bishops who believe that Jesus is no more divine, at least in a supernatural sense, than Bette Midler."

One of Shiflett's interviewees was the Reverend Bruce Gray, Rector of St. John's Episcopal Church in Richmond, Virginia. In an interesting comment, Shiflett recalls that this was the very church where Patrick Henry gave his famous speech in 1775--the speech in which Henry cried: "Give me liberty, or give me death!" As Shiflett notes, "The Episcopal Church, by freeing itself from many of its traditional beliefs, sometimes appears to be well on its way to achieving both." Revered Gray supports the election of Gene Robinson as Bishop of New Hampshire, and he told Shiflett that the biblical condemnations of homosexuality had been considered by thoughtful people who had decided that the texts do not mean what they appear to mean. He cited his own bishop, who had issued an episcopal letter arguing, "Many people believe any homosexual activity is purely prohibited by Scripture . . . . But other Christians who take Scripture seriously believe that the Biblical writers were not addressing the realities of people with a permanent homosexual orientation living in faithful, monogamous relationships, and that the relevant scriptural support for those relationships is similar to the expectations of faithfulness Scripture places on marriage." That is patent nonsense, of course, but this is what passes for theological argument among those pushing the homosexual agenda.

In order to understand why so many Episcopalians are leaving, Shiflett visited Hugo Blankenship, Jr., son of the Reverend Hugo Blankenship, who had served as the church's Bishop of Cuba. Blankenship is a traditionalist, who explained that his father must be "spinning in his grave" in light of developments in his beloved Episcopal Church. As Shiflett sees it, the church that Bishop Hugo Blankenship had served and loved is gone. In its place is a church that preaches a message Shiflett summarizes as this: "God is love, God's love is inclusive, God acts in justice to see that everyone is included, we therefore ought to be co-actors and co-creators with God to make the world over in the way he wishes."

Shiflett also surveys the growing list of "celebrity heretics" whose accepted presence in liberal denominations serves as proof positive of the fact that these groups will tolerate virtually anything in terms of belief. Shiflett discusses the infamous (and now retired) Episcopal Bishop of Newark, New Jersey, John Shelby Spong. "When placed in a wider context, Spong is simply another character from what might be called America's religious freak show." Yet, the most important insight to draw from Spong's heresies is the fact that he has been accepted without censure by his church. As Shiflett explains, Spong's views, "while harshly criticized in some quarters as being far beyond the pale, are present not only throughout the mainline but throughout Protestantism, even in churches that are assumed to maintain traditional theological rigor."

In Shiflett's turn of a phrase, these liberal theologians believe in a "Wee deity," a vapid and ineffectual god who is not much of a threat and is largely up for individual interpretation.

Shiflett's opening story about the seminarian who was confronted by his peers underlines the importance of theological seminaries as agents for either the perpetuation or the destruction of the faith.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bookreview; daveshiflett; exodus; religiousleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 last
To: Texas Eagle

What happens when they issue a fatwa...


101 posted on 06/16/2005 9:44:53 PM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana

"I just want to find a church that doesn't do "modern praise & worship". A church that still has hymnals in the pews, AND NOT a rolldown screen & projector. They're getting as rare as chicken's teeth in the nation's medium-sized cities since competition for the "younger members" is fierce."

I'm with you. I became a member of an LCMS church about a year ago because I liked the tradition and the liturgy of the Lutherans. (I didn't have a denomination before this.) I was at a church meeting last week, where they said they want to try to "sneak in" some modern "praise music," and that they have a perfect spot to put a screen and projector. Ugh. In the interest of attracting the young and hip, we have to resort to this. I don't like it. (I'm 32 yrs old.) I've been reading up on Catholicism, I feel like I'm missing something where I am right now.



102 posted on 06/22/2005 1:39:35 PM PDT by Jennifer in Florida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Jennifer in Florida

I'm in my 30's too, but I sound like such an old fogie about the "modern praise & worship" thing! LOL.
There's just something about affording a little ceremony and tradition to something so sacred that I think adds a little something to it.
To me, modern praise and worship does to the sacredness of prayer and worship what having Thanksgiving dinner on TV trays would do to the sacredness of "the" family meal of the year.
I believe there is room for the modern stuff in prayer meetings (such as on Wed. night) or Sunday School, but the Sunday Service itself should be traditional.


103 posted on 06/22/2005 3:35:31 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana (I was Lucy Ramirez when being Lucy Ramirez wasn't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana

I also agree that the church could make room for more modern music at another time. I suggested to the church council that they should at least offer a choice. We have two Sunday services, one could be "contemporary" and one "traditional," if they have to.


104 posted on 06/23/2005 1:07:50 PM PDT by Jennifer in Florida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Jennifer in Florida

Yeah, just keep the AV screen (even rolled up) outta my line of sight!!!!


105 posted on 06/23/2005 1:30:32 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana (I was Lucy Ramirez when being Lucy Ramirez wasn't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Triggerhippie
I hear that Wisconsin Synod is even more conservative than LCMS. Do any of you know if this is true?

I joined the Missouri Syndicate (That's a joke.) at the age of 44. Then I had to switch to the Wisconsin when we moved to Wisconsin so my sons could attend the Wisconsin Lutheran High School.

Wisconsin is more conservative that Missouri but about the only place that you can notice is that women can't vote on church matters in the Wisconsin Synod.

It is to bad that women can vote at all.

106 posted on 06/23/2005 1:40:51 PM PDT by american_ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson