"they don't say how much he pays but mentioned that the 2 parents pay about the same (dad pays a couple hundred dollars more)"
But, I think the situation here, and why it went to court, was that originally the dad was paying $0.00 in child support. They just each went about their lives with the kids and only if a big expense came up would either have to part with a specific amount of $$. Then, even when the mom started working part time she supplemented with other income from investments, etc. and still did not get a "child support" income from ex-hubby.
Now, she wanted to stop working all together and have him provide a monthly (annual, whatever) "stipend"; and I guess she'll get it now. But, as the kids are older, and as the father does have a great ability to pay, I suppose it's ok for these people. But what I really got out of this article is how really bad a way that is to life one's life as a parent.
I felt sorry for the kids, one week with mom, one week with Dad. How can a kid deal with that? It just seems so disruptive unless they live around the corner from each other.
No. Since their income was nearly equal, and since their placement was equal, he was essentially paying no child support to his ex-wife. He did, however, pay for half of the support of his children -- during the 50% of the time he had placement of them.