"Her years of being cared for and no one ever mentioned she was blind. And the diagnosis of PVS was based not even knowing this primary fact. "
Actually, it was the people saying she was NOT PVS were the ones trying to do so based on her supposed response to visual stimuli. Right?
It was the people who believed she WAS indeed PVS that had said from the beginning that she DOES NOT RESPOND to visual stimuli.
Lets not get it backwards.
Oh no, we must stick to all that justifies Michael killing an unwanted wife rather than turning her over to the parents that still loved her. Michael has the right to kill you know - wonderful Michael.
Champion for those who wish the opportunity to kill off an invalid spouse rather than pay for their care. Makes them free to move on you know and it is free murder.
The younger generation at work. Such a problem having to make these old religious people see the value of this law. So much easier if marriage allows killing rather than "in sickness and health".
And each and every one of our children is at risk in future marriages because of the "wise" changes in the law by their parents.