Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bones75

Oh no, we must stick to all that justifies Michael killing an unwanted wife rather than turning her over to the parents that still loved her. Michael has the right to kill you know - wonderful Michael.

Champion for those who wish the opportunity to kill off an invalid spouse rather than pay for their care. Makes them free to move on you know and it is free murder.

The younger generation at work. Such a problem having to make these old religious people see the value of this law. So much easier if marriage allows killing rather than "in sickness and health".

And each and every one of our children is at risk in future marriages because of the "wise" changes in the law by their parents.


757 posted on 06/16/2005 10:09:09 AM PDT by ClancyJ (McCain: "As far as the criticism is concerned, none of us care about public opinion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 707 | View Replies ]


To: ClancyJ

If Michael wanted to just "get rid" of his wife and be done with her, he could have walked away easily. A guy even offered him a million dollars to to just step off and walk away. That is much more than any money (if any) he gained after her death.

So what do you think his motivation is, other than it being her wishes? Surely he did not take the easy route on this. The easy way would be just to anull the marriage and move on.

Do you think it is more likely or less likely that she would have wanted to languish like that for 15 years? Would you?

Since "money" is out, "convenience" is out as far as motive. What then do you think MS's motivation was? (just asking)


836 posted on 06/16/2005 6:32:55 PM PDT by Bones75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 757 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson