Well we do know that Michael owns the County Sherriff so how hard would it be for him to buy the Medical Examiner. The only way I would have trusted the autopsy is if it was done by the FBI....
We know that? Wow...$700,000 goes a long way these days....
Me thinks thou has thy tongue firmly planted in thy cheek . . .
No, you and your ilk would have only trusted the autopsy would have been if the findings were in keeping with your own bias. You'd be calling this M.E. the only honest man in the county if only the autopsy came back that TS could see, hear, and feel.
There had to be some independent review of the autopsy by someone not in this totally corrupt Pinellas County system. I have seldom seen such overt corruption in one area as I've seen coming out of Pinellas County, Florida. Even if the findings are true, they are not credible because the system that produced them is not credible. Nothing has been proven by this autopsy. Personally, I'm waiting for the Fuhrman book - I am eager to see his analysis and conclusions.
"Well we do know that Michael owns the County Sherriff so how hard would it be for him to buy the Medical Examiner. The only way I would have trusted the autopsy is if it was done by the FBI...."
The only way you would have trusted the autopsy is if it CAME OUT THE WAY YOU WANTED.
.. and not otherwise.
Well we do know that Michael owns the County Sherriff so how hard would it be for him to buy the Medical Examiner. The only way I would have trusted the autopsy is if it was done by the FBI....
***
I noted from the report that the ME also attached reports from other professionals -- e.g., Stephen J. Nelson, M.D. -- a pathologist. Also, in the bibliography to his report, he cites from other sources, such as Charles Winek, a noted pathologist.
Now, are you going to say that all of these other individuals aer part of the "conspiracy"?