[demkicker]

That was the dumbest, most emotionally driven response yet.

I believe those of you who fail to understand the issues here are naive and the primary reason we have juries instead of lynch mobs.

Yeah, right. And I noticed you avoided remarking on the VALID points I made. Here they are again for you to address if you want to try and sugar coat or explain them away:

And I suppose it's just a coincidence that his privates were accurately described and the same molestation acts were identical on each of the previous kids? The books of pornographic pictures of children were just all about Peter Pan wanting to be free and naked, huh?

Fire away...

[NathanR]

And I suppose it's just a coincidence that his privates were accurately described and the same molestation acts were identical on each of the previous kids?

Since he was not on trial for molesting those kids, whether or not his private parts look like a mushroom is irrelevant.

The books of pornographic pictures of children were just all about Peter Pan wanting to be free and naked, huh?

The books were ordinary heterosexual porn, not kiddie porn. He used them to get his victims "aroused".