Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: demkicker
And I suppose it's just a coincidence that his privates were accurately described and the same molestation acts were identical on each of the previous kids?

Since he was not on trial for molesting those kids, whether or not his private parts look like a mushroom is irrelevant.

The books of pornographic pictures of children were just all about Peter Pan wanting to be free and naked, huh?

The books were ordinary heterosexual porn, not kiddie porn. He used them to get his victims "aroused".

459 posted on 06/14/2005 2:15:16 PM PDT by NathanR (Mexico: So far from God; So close to the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies ]


To: NathanR

Wrong... There was a book of naked boys admitted into evidence. It was titled "The Boy".


462 posted on 06/14/2005 2:34:14 PM PDT by demkicker (A skunk sat on a stump; the stump thunk the skunk stunk; the skunk thunk the stump stunk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies ]

To: NathanR

Do you think it's okay for a 45 year old man to admit to sleeping in the same bed with young boys he's not related to? If you do, how could this be stopped? Or should it be stopped?


470 posted on 06/14/2005 2:46:22 PM PDT by blueblazes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson