Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cicero's_son
It's actually funny that anyone would take that stance. There have been plenty of cases over the years that excused the murderous acts of white supremacists/racists based on the fact that they were found "not guilty" by a jury of their peers. Are you actually making the claim that jury verdicts are infallible? Is it your position that second guessing a verdict is somehow subverting justice?
1,812 posted on 06/13/2005 2:59:49 PM PDT by IoCaster ("That to live by one man's will became the cause of all men's misery." - Richard Hooker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1282 | View Replies ]


To: IoCaster
Heaven's no.

But I damn sure am more confident in this jury--which was racially mixed and generally considered "favorable" to the prosecution--than I am in a bunch of people who treated the entire thing as a soap opera.

1,822 posted on 06/13/2005 3:01:33 PM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1812 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson