No, he wasn't charged with that, but he should have been. That's a crime, I believe. BTW, weren't there young boys' fingerprints on said porn?
I have yet to hear about Child Porn found at the mansion. That would have been HUGE in the case espescially if there were fingerprints from the boy found. At that point this case would have been a SLAM DUNK!
However, the only pornography they found afaik were a regular vanilla porn and a hustler.....
You got different intel?
If it was illegal material, you can bet he would have been charged. The material they found was legal, just as a children's swimsuit catalogue is. Now if you found a large stack of children swimsuit catalogues at a single man, with no children, house, it would concern me, however, there is nothing illegal about it.
BTW, weren't there young boys' fingerprints on said porn?
You could have found my fingerprints on my friend's father's porn. Doesn't mean HE showed it to me.