[HairOfTheDog]

I agree but there was reasonable doubt. Jackson is a child molester, but he's just gotten off on all charges. California justice on display.

Do you think that is a coherent post? If there was reasonable doubt, then justice demands acquittal, in CA or elsewhere. He's really really weird. His weirdness is beyond words... But I'm not sure if he's guilty, and I guess neither was anyone else.

[ambrose]

Do you think that is a coherent post? If there was reasonable doubt, then justice demands acquittal, in CA or elsewhere. He's really really weird. His weirdness is beyond words... But I'm not sure if he's guilty, and I guess neither was anyone else.

Exactly.

[DameAutour]

Good post, I agree. The man is weird, undeniably so. But I too am not sure if he's guilty. There was definitely reasonable doubt, and he had to be found not guilty and I'm glad that he was. If there's reasonable doubt, it MUST be not guilty. I've seen too many instances of people being found guilty based on reputation but without credible evidence, and they probably were guilty I guess, but it's always bothered me.

[Calpernia]

What about the alcohol related charges? He walked on all of those too.