First off, it is clear by the way you put Creationism in parenthasis, that you clearly look upon those who believe in God or a Creator as less intelligent. Therefore you are not truly looking for reasonable discussion, but an argument. Nevertheless, I will take your bait.
God created the world essentially as it is. He set it all in motion. We are created in his own likeness, we still retain some of that likeness today although it has been greatly corrupted by sin and the devil. I do certainly believe that creatures do adapt to different environments, this is a key difference from "evolution." I have adapted physically to life in Alaska. Humans have adapted dependng on where they live, they have different characteristics depending on where their ancestors were from. As people meet and meld together they change, it is the way it works. Animals have changed and adapted to different environments. Think about it this way. If you were to make some different kind of animals would you make a cat and a dog totally different? No you would probably base the next design off of a working design. Similar yet different. This is what I think, and I do not presume to know the mind of God, but i think the way we think about things sometimes is a reflection of how He would.
So there is your comment.
> So there is your comment.
Which didn't really seem to answer the question. To you, does "Creationism" mean God made man as he currently is, no "macro-evolution" involved?
> First off, it is clear by the way you put Creationism in parenthasis, that you clearly look upon those who believe in God or a Creator as less intelligent.
What an odd conclusion. I put "Creationism" in quotes because that's the word I'm trying to get some consensus on a definition of.