> So there is your comment.
Which didn't really seem to answer the question. To you, does "Creationism" mean God made man as he currently is, no "macro-evolution" involved?
> First off, it is clear by the way you put Creationism in parenthasis, that you clearly look upon those who believe in God or a Creator as less intelligent.
What an odd conclusion. I put "Creationism" in quotes because that's the word I'm trying to get some consensus on a definition of.
As usual, the repliers are getting caught up in the strictest definitions of the terms themselves.
While man creates with his hands, God has set in place a system of creation that works without his constant intervention.
If God had had one great creative burst, with everything set in place in a grand static design, by now, all life would have ceased to exist.
Evolution and creation are intertwined, since evolution is the maintenance mechanism that allows life to adapt to the constant changes that surround us all.
For men to become embroiled in an argument that one mechanism exists and the other doesn't, is truly missing the point.
Yes God created man essentialy as we are. No evolution involved whatsoever. No change into another species, survival of the fittest. As per the parenthes, fine, if that is truly what you intended.