To: expatpat
Sorry about that, but, "government taxing government" is represented as a flaw in the NRST. But gov't already taxes gov't, through income tax on government workers. It is dishonest, IMO, to neglect to mention this.
300 posted on
06/10/2005 2:47:54 PM PDT by
coloradan
(Hence, etc.)
To: coloradan
Yeah, but there are different ways to make your point. There are some others who get quite malicious.
To: coloradan
Sorry about that, but, "government taxing government" is represented as a flaw in the NRST. But gov't already taxes gov't, through income tax on government workers. It is dishonest, IMO, to neglect to mention this. How exactly is that dishonest. If a government now pays $50K for a worker under the income tax, and under the sales tax it now costs the government $65K, what is dishonest about that point? Do you dispute that or do you not see that it costs more under the sales tax. $65 is more than $50K the last time I checked. What exactly is dishonest?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson