Yeah, but there are different ways to make your point. There are some others who get quite malicious.
You called me to task about "throwing around accusations of lying and fraud." Have you levied this same criticism to the author of this thread, who incidentally was the first to use the term "fraudulent?"
(Furthermore, there are ways other than using terms like "smoke and mirrors" and "so-called" in representing opponent's positions, to paraphrase you.)
The author is quite hostile to supporters of the NRST, plus, he's dishonest in ways I've pointed out. I don't think this earns him an especially respectful response. Am I mistaken?