Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

IIRC, the conference should be on whether or not to grant cert.

This is a very interesting - and quick - development, considering the Raich decision was only released this past Monday.

1 posted on 06/08/2005 6:42:11 AM PDT by gieriscm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: gieriscm

If they rule on this one as the ruled on the MedPot one, then there is nothing left to do but start over with a new government.


2 posted on 06/08/2005 6:52:54 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gieriscm; bang_list
*Bang

Maadi-Griffin trial case.

3 posted on 06/08/2005 6:59:10 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gieriscm
Looks like they were waiting. Says right in the text that they would await the Raich decision before ruling on this one. Looks like they needed to set the precednet before screwing our RKBA with the commerce clause.

Again.

So be it. A may their Gods forgive them.

4 posted on 06/08/2005 7:02:53 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gieriscm; Dead Corpse

I don't recall this case.
Can you give me a quick overview?


5 posted on 06/08/2005 7:29:40 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (McCain and Hillary, two manchurian candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gieriscm

Let me guess: 6-3, majority opinion written by Scalia:

"We find that steel production is a major source of interstate commerce, and therefore find that manufacture, possession, and sale of firearms, which are made of steel, can be banned by Congress properly under the interstate commerce clause. Such a ban does not conflict with the Second Amendment, because when it was written, steel wasn't the major item of commerce at the time that it is today. Conviction upheld, and pleeeeese, Congress get these things off the streets ASAP!"


13 posted on 06/08/2005 7:59:41 AM PDT by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gieriscm

BTT!


23 posted on 06/08/2005 10:34:59 AM PDT by beltfed308 (Cloth or link. Happiness is a perfect trunion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gieriscm
The next order list comes out on Monday morning. Stewart's reverval will be on it.
36 posted on 06/09/2005 10:38:09 AM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gieriscm
Here you go.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S.____(2005).

41 posted on 06/13/2005 8:10:58 AM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gieriscm
Bookmark.

Should be an interesting time..
53 posted on 06/13/2005 12:29:27 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson