Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

This posting about Ginsburg has got be factually inaccurate. It's preposterous that the Senate, with Republican support, would have ever voted to confirm her if she advocated even half of these things!!

Is this Scrappleface, or what?


830 posted on 06/08/2005 1:31:01 PM PDT by Elpasser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 807 | View Replies ]


To: Elpasser

The Ginsburg comments are accurate.


833 posted on 06/08/2005 1:31:39 PM PDT by Bahbah (Something wicked this way comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 830 | View Replies ]

To: Elpasser

It is all true--- I heard Ed Whelan from NRO, telling Laura Ingraham this same stuff on Monday morning--she was just as disbelieving as you are...

AND, Ginsberg only had 3 votes against her...

I think THAT tells us much more about the minds of our Senators than we REALLY wanted to know...don't you think?


841 posted on 06/08/2005 1:33:48 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 830 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson