Posted on 06/08/2005 5:13:10 AM PDT by ken5050
LOL!!!! Definitely!!!!
Thank God - he's through ( for a while)
He's not one I look to for wisdom! I rarely read him as I do not read the Washington Post. They pick out one "conservative", and they are probably taking him out of context. But I like Geroge Will...... when he sticks to baseball!
I love it. LoLoLoL
bookmark
Rino Alert John Warner!
I wasn't around then, either, but I first learned about the New Deal from him.
If someone called me a "radical archconservative", or an "extreme libertarian" or "rightist" etc, I wouldn't be offended, I'd just calmly ask them what viewpoint they considered to be extreme, and would engage them on the issue.
The lib Dems in the Senate are trying to cling desperately to the false belief that they speak for "working families", let alone for people who actually create jobs or wealth. Anyone who ridicules their claim of legitimacy and reveals it to be the Potemkin village it is, will be attacked with all the shopworn weapons in the New Left arsenal.
People were fooled by these tactics for a while, and the lib dems keep going back to the wellspring...
I think Senator Warner drank an early lunch.
You're welcome. I actually had to do that on one of the swimmer pics in this thread.
As they should be. They have a choice between a bull dyke power hungry *itch, and a man who obviously needs some sort of drugs for his bi-polar condition.
Not much of a choice. :-)
So glad you got it!
I love it. LoLoLoL
I believe that's the same one I had to do, and glad I did... LOL!
bookmark
If the Republican Party really was the way the Democrats think it is, I would not be a Republican. But common sense and logic dictate that I be Republican, that's the approach I take. The myths and leaps of logic that the Dems believe are to much for me! They don't pass the smell test. They genrally make no sense. Arguing with a liberal is like talking to a wall! My dense but lovable cat makes more sense then the Democrats, at least he is consistent!
All burps and no rescue.
If there's a pool, put me in at 54-44-2. In favor of passing of course.
That's the first time I saw that picture. Thanks for posting it.
Is it me or is this guy boring?
2811-2 What the heck is that?
I'm not watching, but I know the answer. It is the number of times since 2001 that republicans have voted "no" against a Bush nominee. It is part of the democrats claim of a "rubber stamp". They seem to think that no matter how good Bush's nominees are, republicans should be voting against them.
And one of the two was Lott voting against a re-nominated CLINTON nominee.
At least, I hope that is what this was, since I wasn't watching.....
The analogy doesn't work. If you are floating along in the middle, you are farthest from both shores. You're dumb, Chuckie.
Very good! He was just going for the soundbite and the whack jobs in the MSM will be saying that! Limbaugh is making fun of Obama now! LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.