Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: echoBoomer
"There is no evidence that King Tut was white," Compton City Attorney Legrand Clegg told the board. "Egypt is on the continent of Africa."

There is CERTAINLY no evidence that Tut was black either. Look at Egypt today. He was probably more Arab looking than anything else.
2 posted on 06/08/2005 4:51:50 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (10,000 posts by 29 June!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MikeinIraq
"There is no evidence that King Tut was white," Compton City Attorney Legrand Clegg told the board. "Egypt is on the continent of Africa."

Using that logic, then wouldn't any native-born U.S. citizen calling him or herself African-American be North American instead?

6 posted on 06/08/2005 4:54:56 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MikeinIraq
The Coptic language of old Egypt is a semitic language, therefore, the ancient Egyptians were probably very Mediterranean looking with a strong admixture of negroid characteristics, just like today's Egyptians.
13 posted on 06/08/2005 4:57:13 AM PDT by nuke rocketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MikeinIraq
Actually, look at the Coptic people. Tut probably looked more like them. The majority of people in Egypt now are descendants from the Malmuks (sp) that took over the area.
34 posted on 06/08/2005 5:05:34 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MikeinIraq
I'd bet he'd look Semitic (Jewish/Lebonese) more than anything.
157 posted on 06/08/2005 9:44:25 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MikeinIraq

No kidding. They need to reel it in just a tad.

Were they handing out cheese at the exhibit?


184 posted on 06/08/2005 11:38:31 AM PDT by Jaded (Hell sometimes has fluorescent lighting and a trumpet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MikeinIraq

No kidding. They need to reel it in just a tad.

Were they handing out cheese at the exhibit?


185 posted on 06/08/2005 11:38:31 AM PDT by Jaded (Hell sometimes has fluorescent lighting and a trumpet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MikeinIraq

Lots of Egyptians do not like to be called Arab! Arabs didn't invade until the late 7th century. Tut was probably semitic looking like so many other cultures of the Mediterranean. Later on, in the Alexandrian epoch, lots of blondes from Northern Greece ruled Egypt so there was that mix as well.

The Afrocentrists make all kinds of ridiculous claims.


193 posted on 06/08/2005 12:48:23 PM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MikeinIraq

White and black are relative terms, successfully employed by the racialists to obscure issues.

Negroid and Caucasid are more accurate and Tutankhamun was defintely Caucasoid. Did he look like a Norweigan? Probably not. He probably resembled most north Africans who are dark-skinned Caucasoids.

Some Pharoahs were Negroid, most were not, but an entire dynasty from Kush were.

Ancient Egypt was much like modern Egypt - a multi racial society in which whether or not a person was an Egyptian or a non-Egyptian was far more important than skin pigmentation or the lack of same.

These racialist hucksters should find something more constructive to do with their anger.


196 posted on 06/08/2005 1:21:37 PM PDT by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson