[rwfromkansas]

Well, if you don't care about discussing the nature of our amazing God, fine.

You can believe in your weak begging dog who has to rely on us to somehow choose him Even though THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE SINCE WE ARE ****DEAD IN SIN AND DEAD MEN DON'T GET UP OF THEIR OWN ACCORD AND IT IS GOD WHO BEGINS THE GOOD WORK IN US AND WHO DOES IT ALL IN THE SEQUENCE FROM ROMANS 8:29.

I have better things to do. Good day.

As for me, I believe in the ALMIGHTY.

[WKB]

Discussing God is one thing
Name calling and insults because I don't
agree with you is quite another. That's the way Democrats do things.

[Petronski]

You can believe in your weak begging dog who has to rely on us to somehow choose him . . .

Did you just refer to Almighty God as a weak begging dog?

Have a nice eternity!

[YCTHouston]

"As for me, I believe in the ALMIGHTY"


Puh-leeeeze. RW, I see your same tired cut & paste jobs on one thread after another, and I don't say anything to you b/c you make it painfully obvious that you couldn't keep up with a simple logical discussion.

But I have to object to this ridiculous, tired gimick of hiding from any challenging argument by suggesting (overtly) that anyone who disagrees with you and your stupifying interpretations of scripture is against God. None of us here are against God, just your tireless antagonizing of fellow Christians over scripture, and your profound confusion over the difference between evangelization and self-gratification.

FYI: Just because someone happens to think you personally are an idiot doesn't mean they're dead in sin. If you can't see that, and if you're so callow as to try to hide behind the name of God every time you are mentally overwhelmed, then you really have no business picking the arguments you pick.