Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

Scalia wants to be Chief Justice. No more need be said...


2 posted on 06/07/2005 4:40:46 PM PDT by ambrose (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ambrose

I feel Thomas or Scalia would be a great choice. I think Bush will nominate Thomas just to watch the rats attack a black man.


4 posted on 06/07/2005 4:44:47 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose

That is the most insulting thing I have ever heard about Justice Scalia. Perhaps it's true, but he may have made this decision anyway. Do you really think Bush would factor something like this into his decision. Doesn't matter anyway, Hillary Clinton is going to choose the next chief justice, and it won't be Scalia.


7 posted on 06/07/2005 4:47:44 PM PDT by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose

Have to agree. Scalia politicking for Chief Justice.


9 posted on 06/07/2005 4:48:46 PM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose

I agree.


25 posted on 06/07/2005 5:09:25 PM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose

Exactly right. Thomas is apparently the only justice on the court who consistently adheres to the Constitution and our founders' intent.


29 posted on 06/07/2005 5:14:02 PM PDT by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose

Good point ... and from Scalia's own mouth the reason why Thomas is THE most superiro Justice on the subpreme court! [BTW, the court got this one wrong, as usual, emphasizing once again why the appointing of high court judges is so crucial. Of what good are state or U.S. legislatures if activist, drag-tail (as in stare decesis even if a previous ruling is wrong) judges are too powerful and denying the very Constitution the supposedly pledged to defend and uphold? [It has been interesting to note the duplicitous rhetoric where 'a doctor patient right' is touted with abortion slaughter but denied with a medicinal application. 'Keep the courts out of our prescription lists' isn't ringing too loudly, is it?]


68 posted on 06/07/2005 7:49:38 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose; Abram; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; blackeagle; ...

Libertarian Ping! (I think the break between Scalia and Thomas and Renquist is the big news out of this ruling - I can't say I understand the legaleeze behind Scalia's thought processes. But then again, who needs to? Scalia seems to me to be a G.W. Bush Republican - increase government in the ways good for Republicans, shrink it in ways bad for Democrats. But shrink it overall - they do not.)

82 posted on 06/08/2005 4:57:53 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/charterschoolsexplained.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson