Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vaquero

If Darwinism is not a religion, why adopt religious symbols?

The other thing I find funny about the Darwinism religious symbol is: the fish usually symbolizes "being fishers of man's souls" or "saving souls" - does this Darwinism religious symbol mean "Darwinism devours one's soul"?

Clearly Darwinists are jealous of all the fun religion has with symbols and dogma.

143 posted on 06/07/2005 3:45:19 PM PDT by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Last Visible Dog
Clearly Darwinists are jealous of all the fun religion has with symbols and dogma.

What about "Darwinists" who are also theists?
144 posted on 06/07/2005 3:57:43 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

To: Last Visible Dog
"If Darwinism is not a religion, why adopt religious symbols? The other thing I find funny about the Darwinism religious symbol is: the fish usually symbolizes "being fishers of man's souls" or "saving souls" - does this Darwinism religious symbol mean "Darwinism devours one's soul"? Clearly Darwinists are jealous of all the fun religion has with symbols and dogma. " I am so jealous of you I need to eat another fish icon. damn! nice theory dog, but no cigar for you.
155 posted on 06/07/2005 7:13:01 PM PDT by Vaquero (an armed society is a polite society (Heinlien).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

To: Last Visible Dog
does this Darwinism religious symbol mean "Darwinism devours one's soul"?

It did HIS!!!!



161 posted on 06/08/2005 8:21:19 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

To: Last Visible Dog; All
- does this Darwinism religious symbol mean "Darwinism devours one's soul"?

Well......

 

 

Regarding this interjection, Martin Gardner writes:

"Darwin himself, as a young biologist aboard H.M.S. Beagle, was so thoroughly orthodox that the ship's officers laughed at his propensity for quoting Scripture. Then 'disbelief crept over me at a very slow rate,' he recalled, 'but was at last complete. The rate was so slow that I felt no distress.' The phrase 'by the creator,' in the final sentence of the selection chosen here, did not appear in the first edition of Origin of Species. It was added to the second edition to conciliate angry clerics. Darwin later wrote, 'I have long since regretted that I truckled to public opinion and used the Pentateuchal term of creation, by which I really meant 'appeared' by some wholly unknown process." [stress added] (Gardner, 1984)
 
 

From here ---> http://www.csuchico.edu/~curban/DarwinDayCollectionOneChapter.html


163 posted on 06/08/2005 8:30:37 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson