Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Constitution, version 2.0
WorldNetDaily / Commentary ^ | Posted: June 4, 2005 | By Alan Sears

Posted on 06/04/2005 6:07:03 AM PDT by George Frm Br00klyn Park

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Justanobody
"Already well on the way."

Yup!
Since ... um ....

"Yea, hath God said ... ?"

The Bible is front to back full of good and excellent teachings.
I learned very early in my relationship with Christ, that the best and most common way we are induced to fall is to question God.

Some good teachers in my life have been able to articulate how that question by Satan to Eve, in The Garden, has been his (Satan's) favorite and most effective modus operandi .... question authority.

Whether we accept authority or not, the fact is there will always be an authority in our lives.

If we switch our allegience to authority from God to Satan, guess who becomes the more powerful?

We can never win a war by depleting our ranks ... we need to promote the ones already in-service and recruit new soldiers.

The same is true with America, Americanism, Patriotism and simular such ideas.

If America does not promote into leadership (or the potential leaders never step forward), and recruit new ones (I really enjoy those posts that announce a new FReeper has been born ... ), We will continue to get the Nancy Pelosi's and John Kerry's and etc., etc.

Whom will perform their particular brand of recruiting (the same enticements used by Satan ... lust of the eyes, of the flesh and of self) and they will overcome.

"If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; Then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land."
2 Chronicles 2:14

Still very sound teaching (doctrine).

21 posted on 06/04/2005 7:17:43 AM PDT by knarf (A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
Congress could begin TODAY!.

Congress has had 200 years to "begin" and never has. If you think they're going to start now you're mistaken.

Remember that the Constitution gives the people a means to change whatever doesn't work, and the judicial system doesn't work except for liberals. The Framers knew some changes would have to be made, and they had an abiding distrust of a court system that could get out of control.

So, why are you so much against doing what the Framers gave us the means to do, and what's wrong with judicial term limits?

22 posted on 06/04/2005 7:21:04 AM PDT by Noachian (To Control the Judiciary The People Must First Control The Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

"Rights to a well-paying job, housing, health care, education, recreation . . . are included in this imagined constitution."

Gee, correct me if I am wrong, but I thought every citizen in the US already had these rights.


23 posted on 06/04/2005 7:26:15 AM PDT by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

---This is the most cogent argument I've ever seen for abolishing judicial review. ---

Then we would be in the same shape as the British. The Parliament passes any stupid law they wish and your only recourse is to go beg your Member of Parliament to please reconsider or vote for another one in hopes getting another party in that might change the law.

Look at British gun laws! The Brits beheaded one king that tried to take their arms and dismiss Parliament. Now through Parliament and various bureaucratic regulations they've been almost completely stripped of their traditional rights.


24 posted on 06/04/2005 7:27:30 AM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: George Frm Br00klyn Park

I'm getting real sick of Cass Sunstein and Joshua Micah Marshall.


26 posted on 06/04/2005 7:59:40 AM PDT by sauropod (De gustibus non est disputandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamole

Thanks for the ping. They're not that bad...they afterall ARE progessive. (rolling eyes icon)

I read the article earlier this morning and have already saved it to my file. Before someone else says it, welcome to the Soviet States of America.


27 posted on 06/04/2005 8:02:41 AM PDT by worldclass (www.massright.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MAK1179; briansb
Most important "ping" of the year. Pay attention to what's being planned here.

Cheers,
Lloyd

28 posted on 06/04/2005 8:06:01 AM PDT by Lloyd227
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamole
thanks seamole,

ping!!!

29 posted on 06/04/2005 8:14:11 AM PDT by ThirstyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
This is the most cogent argument I've ever seen for abolishing judicial review.

Actually, 'judicial review' as established in Marbury v. Madison is fine. In that case, they declared a law unconstitutional and therefore null and void. I'm all for fewer laws, and I think that's a fine job for the courts.

The problem is when they go beyond getting rid of a law, and start making their own laws. That's where we are today. Would it be better to throw out the baby of proper judicial review with the bathwater of legislation from the bench?

I think the key concept is: "The US Constitutions establishes a wonderful system of government . . . far superior to the one we live under."
30 posted on 06/04/2005 8:30:32 AM PDT by Gorjus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gorjus

The Constitution version 2.0 come about when Lincoln took office. We are now looking toward version 3.0 or is it 4.0. FDR did even more damage to it.


31 posted on 06/04/2005 8:37:17 AM PDT by libertarianben (Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Frumious Bandersnatch

A billion is good. Why if the government gave every citizen a billion we would all be rich! Yea, that's the ticket!


32 posted on 06/04/2005 9:01:56 AM PDT by GregoryFul (Liberals are pathological liars. They admire liars, they regale in lies, they spread lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Frumious Bandersnatch
Why stop at $80,000? Indeed giving each citizen a billion or so is no sillier and not much more self-destructive either.

This would be even better. Then they wouldn't have to work, which would leave more jobs for the 'undocumented workers'. :)

33 posted on 06/04/2005 9:02:56 AM PDT by nosofar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
Absolutely none of this cr@p will happen if and maybe only IF the American people keep their firearms.

In fact this sort of cr@p is exactly why the founders made sure the people maintained possession and use of firearms.

"It is right to learn even from your enemy."

"Power comes from the barrel of a gun." Mao
34 posted on 06/04/2005 9:12:48 AM PDT by porkchops 4 mahound ("How many Divisions does the Pope have?" "Uncle Joe" Stalin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frumious Bandersnatch

"Why stop at $80,000? Indeed giving each citizen a billion or so is no sillier and not much more self-destructive either."

Because if you make over that you are an evil rich person, except for hollywood elitists pinko commies and New York/New England elitists.


35 posted on 06/04/2005 9:13:46 AM PDT by Jewelsetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
Thanks for posting, George! I was going to post it myself until I did a search for this thread.

Ladies and Gentlemen, these are the stakes in the judicial confirmation battle. This is why conservatives are so livid at the Gang of 14 who acted as enablers to Our Robed Masters. Mr. Frist, get these fine men and women confirmed!

36 posted on 06/04/2005 10:00:41 AM PDT by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamole

I like this Constitution Society better:
http://www.constitution.org/


37 posted on 06/04/2005 11:04:55 AM PDT by Ruadh (Liberty is not a means to a political end. It is itself the highest political end. — LORD ACTON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: knarf
2 Chronicles 2:14
Still very sound teaching (doctrine).

Yes it is - and one of my favorites!

...that question by Satan to Eve,

"Ye shall not surely die:" Gen. 3:4
The beginning of the end.

38 posted on 06/04/2005 11:08:53 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (I - L O V E - my attitude problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Gorjus

Well put.


39 posted on 06/04/2005 11:28:03 AM PDT by Ruadh (Liberty is not a means to a political end. It is itself the highest political end. — LORD ACTON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: George Frm Br00klyn Park

I say hang every last one of these despotic traitors and usurpers, burn down the law schools of Harvard and Yale, and begin anew with professors who teach Constitutionalism instead of watered-down Marxism.


40 posted on 06/04/2005 12:00:10 PM PDT by FierceDraka (The Democratic Party - Aiding and Abetting The Enemies of America Since 1968)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson