Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
My prediction based on the little knowledge I have; I believe the jury *may* convict on the alcohol to a minor charge but not others. However I think both sides screwed up, but they also scored needed points. If a juror wants to find reasonable doubt; I think he/she can justify it based on the case; but I also think a conviction can be justified based on the evidence. This was far from an open/shut case, especially with the prosecutorial mistakes that occurred. It'll be interesting to see how long deliberations will last.

Does anyone know the make-up of the jury (age/gender/etc.?)
9 posted on 06/03/2005 12:30:36 PM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan ("My Friends we did it....we made a difference. ...All in all not bad, not bad at all." Pres. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IMissPresidentReagan

What prosecutorial mistakes, Mr. Darrow? And what is your background to judge such "mistake?" (Law & Order episodes don't count.)


58 posted on 06/03/2005 12:40:46 PM PDT by job ("God is not dead nor doth He sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: IMissPresidentReagan

I think it is 8 women and 4 men with six of the jurors having little boys.


334 posted on 06/03/2005 2:52:58 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson