[Jim_Curtis]

You know how some folks still deny the holocaust? Yeah, Srebrenica is like that - while most of us wouldn't give folks from the IHR the time of day, few of us are adequately equipped to counter their specious arguments, and so it is with Serb revisionists and Milosevic's wars.

Were all Muslims who were executed by the Serbs innocent? Are you an Al Qaeda apologist? "Milosevic's wars"? I suppose Afghanistan and Iraq are "Bush's wars", right?

[joemo]

Were all Muslims who were executed by the Serbs innocent?

were they all guilty? if you want to say its ok to shoot people if you think some of them are guilty then come out and say it. if you think they are all guilty then come out and say it. you and the people arguing this position here are being evasive. you want to link terrorism with the shootings, but you dont want to be clear about it, you want to leave it vague. have the guts to make a clear statement of your position to justify these events.

[Hoplite]

Were all Muslims who were executed by the Serbs innocent?

Is that supposed to be an attempt to justify a war crime, Jim?

Are you an Al Qaeda apologist?

No, but what does Al Qaeda have to do with Srebrenica?

The AQ folks were in central Bosnia, not in the eastern enclaves, and furthermore started arriving after the Serbs started on their Bosnian killing spree.

You might want to read Evan Kohlmann's "Al-Qaida's Jihad in Europe : The Afghan-Bosnian Network" before you attempt to expound upon the subject.

And finally, yes, Milosevic's wars. He started them with the express intent of maintaining and furthering his own power, and to hell with the actual consequences to his constituents or Serbia's neighbors. I really don't care what folks are calling Enduring Freedom or Iraqi Freedom - they're nothing like Milosevic's wars, so I don't consider your question being either relevant or altogether informed.

You don't know much about Milosevic's wars, do you?