Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force Cadet E-Mails Religious Quotes
The Washington Post ^ | 1 June 2005 | Robert Weller

Posted on 06/01/2005 9:18:27 AM PDT by pickemuphere

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-215 next last
To: stuartcr
Im not sure I understand what you are getting at?

You think he was wrong somehow?

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

141 posted on 06/01/2005 11:54:58 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

Must have missed it--but I don't recall any member of the wing staff ever having been involved in more than failing grades.

"They all revolved around the upperclassmen having damn-near-Godlike authority over juniors, and not being adequately supervised." Not even close. The 60s football/eee scandal came out because of an inflexible honor code and cadets who honored it. No upperclass pressure caused it or solved it. The sex-scandals didn't hit until after females entered the academy (and the honor code was watered down). The MURDER scandal likewise involved a female cadet. The worst scandals had nothing to do whatsoever with the authority of upper classmen or wing staff members.

"The Air Force Academy has a particularly bad corporate culture in this regard." I couldn't agree more--but not for the reasons you espouse. The administration has jumped LEFT to every idiot accusation thrown at them, firing some of their best, keeping some of their worst in the process.


142 posted on 06/01/2005 11:55:29 AM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
At this point in time, I'd be little worried about a Muslim extremist being my superior if I were in the AFA.

If however one were a Muslim extremist and an officer at the AFA, I'm sure the media would think whatever pronouncements made would be just ducky; what with diversity and all that.

Since when was religious pronouncments in a (supposed) Judeo-Christian country a problem?

Never mind...I think I know the answer.

143 posted on 06/01/2005 11:58:18 AM PDT by Sam's Army (Fight them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Cogadh na Sith
I quoted the article as it was--

Actually, no. You created a quote that implied the managers said to their employees "Even though you're not Christians...", which seems at odds with the focus of the article. Rather, they were simply enumerating the "normal" ways of motivating employees. There are EXTRA ways of motivating Christian employees.

I cannot believe they are separating employees into 'camps'

Actually, the employees usually pretty much do this for you.

I think you are already in a world of hurt in a company if you even see employees as 'Christian' or 'Non-Christian'.

Well, more accurately, the camps are usually "professing Christian" and "Not Really Sure". Sometimes you get a third camp which is "Say Jesus and I'll Hit You", but you usually just put them with the second camp.
144 posted on 06/01/2005 11:59:43 AM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Sam's Army

The article didn't state how many were offended, so who knows?


145 posted on 06/01/2005 12:00:26 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mach9

???


146 posted on 06/01/2005 12:01:16 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Cogadh na Sith

Got that right.

I've had a number of supervisors that flat-out refused to authorize me to go to Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur services. And when questioned about whether or not they'd allow an airman off for Easter services, they'd always say that Easter services wouldn't be a problem.

It's gotten so bad that the even the Christian chaplains have had to issue orders stating that Jewish services are authorized and that, barring mission, Jewish personnel cannot be refused should they wish to attend.


147 posted on 06/01/2005 12:01:46 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Raaargh! Raaargh! Crush, Stomp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: D Rider

As I stated in #20.


148 posted on 06/01/2005 12:02:31 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Well, probably very little then. But, I'm sure if the "event" gets bigger they can manufacture some numbers like they do in regards to how many folks are homeless or have no health insurance.

Some Doth Protest Too Much.

149 posted on 06/01/2005 12:02:55 PM PDT by Sam's Army (Fight them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Cogadh na Sith
"Do you understand the difference between preaching to your congregation to fight and preaching to your fighters to convert?"

Sure, but I don't have a copy of the email and all the article said is, "Jurewicz lists his favorite quotations in the message, including several about Jesus. One quotation, "Bear one another's burdens, and so you will fulfill the law of Christ," is a biblical verse."

That doesn't sound like "preaching to your fighters to convert". It sounds more like one expressing his views, which happen to be protected by the first amendment. But to be fair, this can be taken out of context and as I said, I don't have the email he sent.

FRegards,
DocRock
150 posted on 06/01/2005 12:03:52 PM PDT by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla

Yeah.... It's pretty bad.


151 posted on 06/01/2005 12:04:45 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (Steel Bonnets Over the Border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: DocRock
It sounds more like one expressing his views, which happen to be protected by the first amendment.

Not on the official e-mail network it ain't....

152 posted on 06/01/2005 12:05:53 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (Steel Bonnets Over the Border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom
So you do lead Christian employees differently.

That's not a recipe for success in an organization. I was in a unit that had a Mormon clique.

It tore the unit apart....

153 posted on 06/01/2005 12:08:03 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (Steel Bonnets Over the Border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

Do you honestly think that?


154 posted on 06/01/2005 12:08:08 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

No, just obvious.


155 posted on 06/01/2005 12:09:08 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

ave read and reread my posted reply and nowhere did I claim your reply had squat to do with religion.don't get your panties in a bunch crunch.


156 posted on 06/01/2005 12:09:48 PM PDT by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #157 Removed by Moderator

To: Cogadh na Sith
As a supervisor, would you treat your 'Christian' employees differently than your 'Non-Christian' employees?

Sometimes - but not in the way that you think. I expect them both to perform to a high standard. In matters of integrity or accountability, however, I'm not unwilling to appeal to Biblical principles when dealing with the overtly Christian employee. Does this mean I have trouble dealing with non-(overt)Christian employees? Of course not. It just means that appealing to Biblical principles isn't one of my options for them. Truth be told, it's not my FIRST option when dealing with Christian employees, either, but it's certainly an option.
158 posted on 06/01/2005 12:10:27 PM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: pickemuphere

"The General most earnestly requires and expects a due observance of those articles of war established for the government of the army, which forbid profane cursing, swearing and drunkenness. And in like manner, he requires and expects of all offers and soldiers not engaged in actual duty, a punctual attendance of Divine services, to implore the blessing of Heaven upon the means used for our safety and defense." General Order issued by George Washington the day after he took command of the Continental Army.


159 posted on 06/01/2005 12:10:30 PM PDT by usslsm51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom
It just means that appealing to Biblical principles isn't one of my options for them. Truth be told, it's not my FIRST option when dealing with Christian employees, either, but it's certainly an option.

OK. I agree with that.... But as soon as there forms a perception that the professing Christians are being rewarded, it's all over....

160 posted on 06/01/2005 12:16:23 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (Steel Bonnets Over the Border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson