Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I don't watch any of the morning shows and don't have the slightest idea what Katie does and doesn't express concern for. If she does believe abortions should be legal and available (which she probably does, but, once again, I pay no attention at all to the woman), then there's absolutely no way she would express concern for an unborn person on the show, would she? And even if she wanted to, how would she intro it? Show an abortion?

Sorry about the nonsensical remark. I should have just stuck with non sequitor.


159 posted on 05/26/2005 9:58:55 AM PDT by Gone GF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: Gone GF

I appreciate your post. Let's put terminology behind us and discuss the issue.

I used to be pro-choice. I began shifting some years ago when I heard someone on the radio - it might have been Rush - point out the hypocrisy of animal rights advocates, most of whom it's fair to assume are pro-choice - being so concerned about killing baby seals yet utterly indifferent to the killing of unborn humans.

So perhaps I'm particularly touchy on the issue, but when I hear a liberal waxing emotional over harm to an animal, it bothers me. How can they be so exquisitely sensitive when it comes to animals, yet so utterly indifferent when it comes to humans?


160 posted on 05/26/2005 10:03:48 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson