What, that inanimate matter can, by virtue of natural selection and random mutations, become alive and communicate with me by saying, "Intelligent Design has nothing to do with my existence?" You're right. I don't understand the concept, and neither you nor your cheerleaders have done well at explaining it. You've done even worse by promoting the notion that there is no other answer worthy of consideration where learning and education are concerned. The Inquisition never died. It only changed shoes.
What, that inanimate matter can, by virtue of natural selection and random mutations, become alive and communicate with me by saying, "Intelligent Design has nothing to do with my existence?"
No one's talking about "inanimate matter." How many times has this been pointed out?
You're assuming 1) intelligence and 2) design, without having demonstrated either. Therefore, you're begging the question.
You're right. I don't understand the concept, and neither you nor your cheerleaders have done well at explaining it.
Please do not mistake your willful ignorance for the others' failure.
You've done even worse by promoting the notion that there is no other answer worthy of consideration where learning and education are concerned. The Inquisition never died. It only changed shoes.
Again, you appear confused. All the posters here are saying is that anything presented as science must be science. If you want to claim that ID is scientific, kindly point out where the science is in ID. I have yet to see anything remotely scientific about it.