I should hope the second link to be better than the first. The former points to an error. How about you just cite the title and author of a book that presents fossil evidence where is has been found? I'll go to the library and check it out.
Without apology, I do not engage in much detailed research before posting. You may be in this mostly for the hell of it. I'm in it mostly for the fun of it. I am just an ordinary observer who seeks to apprehend the difference between reasonable conjecture and immutable fact, a distinction herein demonstrably lost upon certain ones who purport to be perfessers, scientists, and the like.
Furthermore, what is a "shame" to you is of little concern to me.
Your observation shall be noted for posterity.
Without apology, I do not engage in much detailed research before posting.
Obvious to anyone. See above.
You're not an ordinary observer. You refuse to do any research of your own yet expect us to spoon-feed you the entire history of the physical sciences and put up with your militantly ignorant sniping besides. An ordinary observer might be cajoled into participating in the learning process, taking an independent interest in the subject matter, and working out the calculations for himself.
You're content to prattle on about how ignorant you are without making the slightest effort towards a resolution. There must be some explanation other than that you are a colossal tool, but I'm at a loss to formulate one.