I thoutht you had argued elsewhere that the laws of nature are intelligently designed. I don't see any factual errors in the outline, but it is just an outline. It's pretty hard to put the sum of human knowledge in an outline.
I maintain that the laws of nature are evidence of intelligent design. I do so because the things humans design are intended, for the most part, to remain constant.
It's pretty hard to put the sum of human knowledge in an outline.
Yes it is. I would hardly expect a biology textbook to lay it all out, let alone an outline. At the same time I would hope either one could do better than suggest abiogenesis and leave it at that.