To: PatrickHenry
...then I'll just drop back into lurking mode. It strikes me thare is an attempt here to change the scope of the debate and shift the emphasis towards abiogenesis. There's an enormous difference between debating whether natural selection is adequate to explain the process of evolution, and debating whether a yet to be specified hypothesis is adequate to describe first life.
1,743 posted on
05/28/2005 8:48:58 PM PDT by
js1138
(e unum pluribus)
To: js1138
It strikes me thare is an attempt here to change the scope of the debate and shift the emphasis towards abiogenesis. It's more than that. See my post 1,779.
1,780 posted on
05/29/2005 4:55:22 AM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
To: js1138
It strikes me thare is an attempt here to change the scope of the debate and shift the emphasis towards abiogenesis.I reckon there may be a few elementary science books out there that suggest as much. My daughter's Jr. High textbook does.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson