Whatever. My argument concerns the manner of policing and silencing free thought and expression, not its degree. My assertion stands that dogmatic evolutionists cannot stomach the suggestion that Darwinian evolution has some explaining to do. So much so they would rather file lawsuits than see the subject of ID brought up in an academic context. This does not speak well for their supposed interest in executing the conquest of ignorance.
Well, you're certainly entitled to your opinion, both as to the existence of "dogmatic" evolutionists and that they have some 'splainin' to do.
So much so they would rather file lawsuits than see the subject of ID brought up in an academic context.
Huh. Would you feel the same way about someone filing suit to get their children properly educated in a school district that decided to give equal time in college-track english class to eubonics and phonics?