[xzins]

We would disagree on the randomness that's a necessity of the evolution model.

Also, there's plenty of evidence of a deity. So far as our worldview imposing limitations of our ability to speculate, it's a given in many other disciplines. Therefore, it makes sense here.

Just so I know where you're coming from: Using standard definitions, I am a religious person (see my tagline.) Are you?

[AntiGuv]

We would disagree on the randomness that's a necessity of the evolution model.

If indeed we did, then one or both of us would be wrong. If it were only one, then that would almost certainly be you.

Also, there's plenty of evidence of a deity.

If there were any evidence of a deity, much less plenty, we wouldn't be having this debate.

So far as our worldview imposing limitations of our ability to speculate, it's a given in many other disciplines. Therefore, it makes sense here.

Nor did I dispute that.

Just so I know where you're coming from: Using standard definitions, I am a religious person (see my tagline.) Are you?

No.

[AntiGuv]

Oh, and I'll qualify another statement: If there were any recognizable evidence of a deity, much less plenty, we wouldn't be having this debate.